Abstract

This paper explores how Old French words were adopted and changed in Middle English, focusing on pronunciation changes from Old English to Middle English. The study examines vowel and consonant changes using phonological theories to explain these transformations. Key changes include Old French [a] becoming Middle English [ɑː], and Old French [e] changing to Middle English [eɪ]. Consonant changes include Old French [ʒ] shifting to Middle English [dʒ] and the retention of [ʃ]. Additionally, stress patterns shifted from the final syllable in Old French to the initial syllable in Middle English. The study highlights the dynamic nature of language borrowing and how social factors, like the Norman Conquest, influence it. By examining these phonological changes, the paper aims to enhance our understanding of historical linguistics and phonological adaptation, highlighting unresolved issues and gaps in previous research. The findings reveal the complex processes involved in integrating and modifying loanwords, reflecting the interplay between language and culture. This research underscores the resilience and adaptability of languages, contributing to a richer appreciation of the diversity and complexity of human communication and the historical processes that shape language evolution. By shedding light on these phonological shifts, the paper provides valuable insights into the mechanisms of language change, the influence of sociopolitical events on linguistic evolution, and the ongoing interconnections between different linguistic traditions throughout history. Ultimately, this study enhances our appreciation of how languages evolve and adapt over time.

1. Introduction

While exploring English, I couldn't help but be captivated by the influences of Old French on the language. From the pages of contemporary literature to the conversations of everyday life, traces of French can still be found everywhere in the English language. Understanding these linguistic borrowings is crucial because it unveils the rich tapestry of cultural exchange and historical influence that has shaped English into the dynamic and multifaceted language it is today. Thus, this paper explores the phonological evolution of Old French loanwords into English, focusing on their initial incorporation during the Old English period and subsequent pronunciation changes leading into Middle English.

By delving into the phonological evolution of Old French loanwords into English, I aim to uncover the hidden nuances of language contact and exchange. Understanding how these loanwords were initially incorporated into Old English and subsequently transformed during the transition into Middle English is not only intellectually stimulating but also essential for grasping the dynamic nature of linguistic evolution.

Moreover, the significance of French influence on English cannot be overstated, particularly in the aftermath of the Norman Conquest. This historical event not only altered the political and social landscape of England but also left an indelible mark on the English language (Duncan, 2024). By examining the phonological changes that occurred as Old French words were assimilated into English, we gain deeper insights into the mechanisms of linguistic borrowing and adaptation.

Through this study, I hope to illuminate not only the historical processes that shaped the English language, but also the enduring interconnections between languages and cultures. By understanding how languages borrow, adapt, and evolve over time, we gain a richer appreciation for the diversity and complexity of human communication. Ultimately, this exploration of phonological evolution serves as a testament to the resilience and adaptability of language in the face of cultural exchange and transformation.

2. Background

The history of French loanwords entering the English lexicon is intricately tied to the sociopolitical and cultural exchanges between England and France, especially following the Norman Conquest of 1066. William the Conqueror's victory at the Battle of Hastings not only secured his reign over England but also initiated a centuries-long era of Norman rule (Duncan, 2024). This conquest brought about a fusion of Norman and Anglo-Saxon cultures, leading to significant socio political and linguistic transformations (Zsófia 2006).

The Norman rulers, hailing from the northern region of France, introduced their language, Old Norman French, to the English court and administration. As the language of the elite and the ruling class, Old Norman French swiftly permeated various aspects of English society, from the corridors of power to the humblest of villages. This linguistic shift was not merely superficial; it reflected and reinforced the Normans' dominance and influence over England.

The influx of French loanwords into English during this period was extensive and multifaceted. Words relating to governance and administration, such as "government," "parliament," and "royalty," entered the English lexicon, reflecting the Norman administrative structures imported into England. Legal terminology, too, saw a significant infusion of French words, as the Normans brought with them their legal system and practices. Terms like "justice," "jury," and "verdict" became integral parts of English legal discourse (Duncan, 2024).

Furthermore, legal terminology underwent a profound transformation with the infusion of French words into English. Terms like "justice" (from French "justice"), "jury" (from French "juré"), and "verdict" (from French "verdict") became integral components of English legal discourse, embodying the Normans' legal system and practices (Zsófia, 2006). These borrowed words not only introduced new concepts but also conferred a sense of legitimacy and sophistication to the English legal framework, reflecting the Normans' influence on the administration of justice.

The Norman Conquest left an indelible mark on the English military vocabulary, reshaping the language of warfare and martial prowess. Words like "army" (from French "armée"), "soldier" (from French "soldat"), and "battle" (from French "bataille") entered the English lexicon, reflecting the Normans' militaristic society and their dominance on the battlefield (Zsófia, 2006). These borrowed words not only enriched the English vocabulary but also served as reminders of the Norman Conquest's enduring impact on English military history.

Beyond governance and warfare, everyday life was also profoundly influenced by French-derived words, enriching English vocabulary related to food, clothing, and social interactions. Words like "beef" (from French "bœuf"), "mutton" (from French "mouton"), "dress" (from French "dresser"), and "dinner" (from French "dîner") became commonplace in English discourse, reflecting the culinary and sartorial preferences of the Norman elite (Zsófia, 2006). Similarly, terms like "dance" (from French "danser"), "marriage" (from French "mariage"), and "pleasure" (from French "plaisir") entered the English lexicon, adding depth and nuance to expressions of social interaction and human experience (Zsófia, 2006).

However, the integration of French loanwords into English was not a unidirectional process. It involved not only the adoption of French terms but also their adaptation to fit the phonological and grammatical patterns of English. This process of Anglicization gave rise to variations in pronunciation, spelling, and usage, further blurring the lines between the two linguistic traditions (Zsófia, 2006). There will be more examples that will be shown and analyzed.

This event marked the beginning of a substantial influx of Old French words into English, significantly enriching its vocabulary. The loanwords spanned various domains, including governance, law, military, and daily life, reflecting the Norman influence on English society. This period also set the stage for phonological transformations as these French words were anglicized (Duncan, 2024).

3. Review of Current Research

Several key studies have contributed to our understanding of the phonological evolution of Old French loanwords into Middle English. For example, Baugh and Cable's "A History of the English Language" provides a comprehensive overview of the historical development of English, including the significant impact of French loanwords. They emphasize the role of sociopolitical factors in language change and the phonological adaptations that occurred as a result of the Norman Conquest (Baugh & Cable, 2002).

Additionally, Richard M. Hogg's "The Cambridge History of the English Language" delves into the phonological and morphological changes that characterized the transition from Old English to Middle English. Hogg's work provides detailed analyses of specific sound changes, including the adaptation of French vowel and consonant sounds into the English phonological system (Hogg, 1992).

Moreover, Fausto Cercignani's study on the development of k and sk in Old English offers insights into the phonological processes that influenced the integration of French loanwords. Cercignani's research highlights the complexities of sound change and the factors that conditioned these phonological shifts (Cercignani, 1983).

However, there remain unresolved issues and debates within the study of phonological evolution. One such debate centers on the exact phonological environments and conditioning factors that led to specific sound changes. For example, the adaptation of Old French fricatives and affricates into Middle English remains a topic of ongoing research. By focusing on these unresolved phonological questions, this study aims to provide a more precise understanding of the mechanisms of language contact and the adaptation processes involved.

Through this detailed phonological analysis, this paper seeks to contribute to a deeper understanding of historical linguistics and phonological adaptation, highlighting the gaps in current research and proposing new directions for future studies.

4. The Phonetics and Phonology of Old English and Old French

Phonology of Old English:

In understanding the phonological evolution of Old French loanwords into Middle English, it's essential to first grasp the phonology of Old English. Old English, also known as Anglo-Saxon, emerged from the West Germanic dialects spoken by the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes who migrated to Britain from what is now Denmark and northern Germany in the early Middle Ages. These Germanic tribes brought with them their language, which gradually evolved into Old English through contact with the indigenous Celtic languages spoken in Britain at the time. Over the centuries, Old English underwent significant changes in vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation, influenced by various factors such as contact with Latin through Christianity and the Viking invasions in the 8th and 9th centuries (Baugh & Cable, 2002).

English, including Old English, belongs to the Germanic branch of the Indo-European language family. Within the Germanic branch, English is classified under the West Germanic subgroup, along with languages such as German, Dutch, and Frisian. Old French, on the other hand, belongs to the Romance branch of the Indo-European language family. Romance languages evolved from Vulgar Latin, the spoken form of Latin used by common people in the Roman Empire. Old French is part of the Gallo-Romance subgroup, which also includes other early Romance languages spoken in northern France during the medieval period, such as Old Norman and Old Picard (Lodge, 2001).

The phonetic inventory of Old English consisted of a relatively simple vowel system compared to modern English. Old English had five short vowels and five long vowels, which were pronounced with clear distinctions in length. The short vowels were [æ], [e], [i], [o], and [u], while the long vowels were [æː], [eː], [iː], [oː], and [uː]. Additionally, Old English had diphthongs, which were combinations of vowel sounds, such as [ea], [eo], [ie], and [io ] (Campbell, 1959).

The phonological rules of Old English governed the pronunciation of vowels, consonants, and their interactions within words. One notable phonological rule in Old English was vowel lengthening before certain consonant clusters. For example, in Old English, the vowel [i ] would lengthen to [iː ] before a nasal consonant followed by another consonant, as in the word "cild" (child), pronounced [t͜ʃiːld]. Another rule involved the weakening of certain consonants in unstressed syllables, known as unstressed vowel reduction. For instance, the Old English word "brycg" (bridge) would be pronounced with a weakened [g ] sound in the unstressed syllable, sounding more like [bridʒ ] (Mitchell & Robinson, 2001). These phonological rules, among others, shaped the pronunciation patterns of Old English and influenced its evolution over time. Understanding these phonological aspects of Old English provides a crucial foundation for analyzing the adaptations and modifications that occurred as Old French loanwords entered the language.

Consonant	IPA Value1	Old English Example	Comments
b	b	bār, ‘boar’
c	k	cyning, ‘king’	Often spelled with a k in Middle and Modern English
ʧ	ċīese	The dot above the letter for this sound is a modern convention not found in the manuscripts.
cg	ʤ	ecg, ‘edge’
d	d	dysiġ, ‘foolish’
f	f	wīf, ‘woman’
v	wīfum, ‘to/by/for/with the women’
g	g	gār, ‘spear’
ɣ	būgan, ‘to bow’	These sounds are commonly spelled with a w in modern English.
j	ġeard, ‘enclosure, yard’	The dot above the letter for this sound is a modern convention not found in the manuscripts.
h	h	hlūde, ‘loud’	Initially
x	cniht	Medially and finally; often spelled gh in Middle and Modern English
l	l	lār, ‘teaching, lore’	&#:x00A0;
m	m	miċel, ‘great, big; Yorkshire: mickle’
n	n	nȳd, ‘necessity’
ŋ	sang	When in combination with g, say the sound as in modern English -ing words, but then also add the g.
p	p	pleoh, ‘danger, risk’
r	r	rōf, ‘strong’	Rolled.
s	s	seġl, ‘sail’
z	cēosan, ‘to choose’
sc	ʃ	æsc, ‘ash’
sk	ascian, ‘to ask’	Many (but not all) words with sk in Modern English are of Norse original while those with sh are from Old English; cf. shirt (from Old English) and skirt (same word, but from Norse)
t	t	til, ‘good’
þ or ð	θ	þær (or ðær), ‘there’
ð	cweðan (or cweþan), ‘to say’

(O’Donnel, 2008)

Old English Vowel	IPA Symbol1	Mnemonic	Old English Example
ȳ	yː	French ruse	cȳþþ ‘kith, friends’
ī	iː	beat	wīte, ‘punishment’
ē	eː	bait	ēþel, ‘homeland, territory’
ā	ɑː	aunt (non-Canadian pronunciation) [2]	stān, ‘stone’
ǣ	æː	bat	bæde, ‘bade, i.e. asked, commanded’
ō	oː	boat	gōd, ‘good’
ū	uː	boot	brūcan, ‘to enjoy’

(O’Donnel, 2008)

Old English Vowel	IPA Symbol1	Mnemonic	Old English Example
y	y	French tu	cynn ‘kin, family’
i	ɪ	bit	scip, ‘ship’
e	ɛ	bet	ecg, ‘ecg, sword’
a	ɑ	father	pað, ‘path’
æ	æ	bad	cræft, ‘skill or trade’
o	ɔ	bought	god, ‘God’
u	ʊ	book	sunu, ‘son’

(O’Donnel, 2008)

Phonology of Old French:

In addition to understanding the phonology of Old English, it's also important to consider the phonological characteristics of Old French (Price, 1971). Old French, spoken from approximately the 9th to the 14th century, underwent significant changes during this period, influenced by factors such as Latin, Germanic languages, and regional dialects. The phonological system of Old French was characterized by a variety of vowel and consonant sounds, with regional variations contributing to linguistic diversity. Vowels in Old French exhibited a range of qualities, including front, central, and back vowels, with nasalized vowels also playing a prominent role (Price, 1971). Consonants in Old French included stops, fricatives, nasals, and liquids, with variations in pronunciation influenced by factors such as word position and phonetic environment (Luquiens, 1809). By understanding the phonological features of Old French, we can better appreciate the nuances of sound change and adaptation as Old French loanwords entered Middle English.

Old French, being a Romance language, belongs to the Romance branch of the Indo-European language family. Within the Romance branch, Old French is classified as part of the Gallo-Romance subgroup, which also includes other early Romance languages spoken in northern France during the medieval period, such as Old Norman and Old Picard. The Romance branch itself evolved from Vulgar Latin, the spoken form of Latin used by common people in the Roman Empire. Romance languages are characterized by their development from Latin and their common features such as the loss of the Latin case system and the development of new grammatical structures, including articles and verb conjugations (Boyd-Bowman, 1980).

The phonetic inventory of Old French was complex, reflecting the influence of Latin and other languages spoken in the region (Kibler, 1984). Vowels in Old French included a variety of sounds, with distinctions between close and open vowels, as well as nasalized vowels. Consonants in Old French encompassed stops, fricatives, nasals, and liquids, with variations in pronunciation influenced by factors such as word position and surrounding sounds. The phonological rules of Old French governed the pronunciation of vowels and consonants, as well as their interactions within words (Kibler, 1984). One notable phonological rule in Old French was the phenomenon of nasalization, where vowels preceding nasal consonants became nasalized themselves, as in the word "bon" (good), pronounced [bɔ̃ ] with a nasalized vowel. Another rule involved the reduction or loss of certain consonant sounds in word-final positions, such as the weakening of the final consonant in the word "temps" (time), pronounced [tɑ̃ ] with a silent final consonant (Boyd-Bowman, 1980). Understanding these phonological features of Old French provides insight into the phonetic patterns and tendencies that influenced the adaptation and integration of Old French loanwords into Middle English(Kibler, 1984).

	Laryngeals	Gutturals	Uvulars	Velars	Palatals	Linguals	Labials
Consonants  Plosive	ʔ		q  ɢ	k  g	c  ɟ	t  d	p  b
Nasal				ŋ	ɲ	n	m
Lateral				ɫ	ʎ	l
Rolled		Q	ᴙ R			r
Friccative	h    ɦ	H	ᴚ ʁ	(ʍ W) x g	(ɥ) ç ʝ	ɹ, Θ ð, ʃ ʒ,   s z,	f v   F ʋ ʍ W ɥ
Vowels  Close   Half-close   Middle   Half-open   Open				u ɯ ü  ï y i   ʊ        Y I oö ë ø e        ə ɔ ʌ ɔ̈ ä œ ɛ        ɐ   æ        ɑ     a			(u ü   y)    (o ö ø)  (ɔ ɔ̈ œ)

(Udomkesmalee, 2024)

5. Phonetic Modifications

Vowel Modifications:

The transition of Old French loanwords into Middle English brought about significant modifications in vowel pronunciation. In Old French, vowels such as 'e' and 'o' were pronounced with distinct phonetic qualities, characterized by clear articulation and precise vowel sounds (Luquiens, 1809). For example, the Old French word 'me' was pronounced as [mə], with the vowel 'e' pronounced as a mid-central vowel with a schwa-like quality. Similarly, the Old French word 'pomme' was pronounced as [pɔmə], with the vowel 'o' pronounced as an open-mid back rounded vowel, distinctively clear and precise in its articulation (Kruitbosch, 2018). However, as these loanwords entered the English phonological system, they underwent notable shifts in vowel quality.

For instance, the Old French word "table" (pronounced [tablə]) evolved into the Middle English "table" (pronounced [tɑːblə]) (Luquiens, 1809). Here, the Old French vowel [a ] was typically pronounced with a more closed mouth position compared to its Middle English counterpart [ɑː]. This shift in vowel quality is evident in the pronunciation difference between the two languages. In Old French, the vowel [a ] was pronounced with a relatively closed mouth position, producing a sound closer to [a]  or [æ] . However, in Middle English, the vowel [ɑː ] was pronounced with a more open mouth position, resulting in a sound similar to [ɑː]  or [ɒ]  (Kruitbosch, 2018). This phonetic difference reflects the influence of phonological changes and articulatory adjustments that occurred as Old French loanwords were assimilated into Middle English phonology (Baker, 2007).

During the transition from Old French to Middle English, the vowel [ø] in the Old French word "beaute" underwent a notable shift to the Middle English diphthong [juː] (Baker, 2007). This transformation resulted in a change from the clear and rounded vowel quality of [ø] to the diphthong [juː], characterized by a glide from a more closed to a more open vowel position. Similarly, in the word "pere," the Old French vowel [ɛ] experienced a shift to [ɪ] in Middle English pronunciation. This change involved a transition from a more mid-open front vowel [ɛ] to a closer and slightly higher front vowel [ɪ] (Baker, 2007). These modifications in vowel quality reflect the complex phonetic adjustments that occurred as Old French loanwords were integrated into the evolving phonological system of Middle English (Baker, 2007).

Similarly, the Old French word "nature" (pronounced [natyrə]) transformed into the Middle English "nature" (pronounced [neɪtjʊr]). In this case, the Old French vowel [y ] underwent a shift in pronunciation to the Middle English diphthong [eɪ], resulting in a subtle but discernible alteration in vowel quality (Alhjouj, 2016).

In Old French, vowels such as 'e' and 'o' were pronounced with distinct phonetic qualities, characterized by clear articulation and precise vowel sounds. For example, the Old French word 'me' was pronounced as [mə], with the vowel 'e' pronounced as a mid-central vowel with a schwa-like quality, while 'pomme' was pronounced as [pɔmə], with the vowel 'o' pronounced as an open-mid back rounded vowel, distinctively clear and precise in its articulation. However, as these loanwords entered the English phonological system, they underwent notable shifts in vowel quality. The Old French word "table" (pronounced [tablə]) evolved into the Middle English "table" (pronounced [tɑːblə]), where the Old French vowel [a ] shifted to the Middle English vowel [ɑː] (Kruitbosch, 2018). Similarly, "nature" (pronounced [natyrə]) transformed into "nature" (pronounced [neɪtjʊr]), where the Old French vowel [y ] underwent a shift to the Middle English diphthong [eɪ]. Other examples include "corps" ([kɔʁ] to [kɔɹps]), "soleil" ([sɔlɛj] to [sʌlɛɪ]), "homme" ([ɔm] to [hʌm]), "jour" ([ʒuʁ] to [dʒʌr]), and "tous" ([tus] to [tuːs]). These shifts in vowel quality reflect the phonological adjustments that occurred as Old French loanwords were assimilated into the phonetic system of Middle English (Kruitbosch, 2018).

For comparison to modern French pronunciation, these words are now pronounced differently. In contemporary French, "table" is pronounced as [tabl], "nature" as [natyʁ], "corps" as [kɔʁ], "soleil" as [sɔlɛj], "homme" as [ɔm], "jour" as [ʒuʁ], and "tous" as [tus]. The modern French pronunciation often differs significantly from their Old French counterparts, showcasing the evolution of the French language over time. This divergence in pronunciation underscores the extent of phonological change that has occurred between Old French and contemporary French, emphasizing the fluid nature of language evolution across different historical periods.

Vowel Shifts from Old French to Middle English:

1. Shift of [a] to [ɑː]:

• Example: Old French "table" ([tablə]) to Middle English "table" ([tɑːblə])

• Conditioning Factors and Environments: This shift often occurred in stressed syllables where the vowel [a] in Old French was lengthened and slightly backed in Middle English to [ɑː]. The lengthening was typically conditioned by the presence of certain consonantal environments and stress patterns. For instance, the presence of a following voiced consonant or a consonant cluster could trigger the lengthening and backing of the vowel (Kruitbosch, 2018).

• Phonological Patterns: This shift fits into the broader pattern of vowel lengthening in stressed syllables, a common phonological process in Middle English that aimed to create a clearer distinction between stressed and unstressed syllables.

1. Shift of [e] to [ɛ] or [eɪ]:

• Example: Old French "beauté" ([bø]) to Middle English "beauty" ([bjuːti])

• Conditioning Factors and Environments: The vowel [e] in Old French often shifted to a diphthong [eɪ] in Middle English, especially when followed by a palatal or velar consonant. The diphthongization was influenced by the need to maintain vowel distinctions in a language that was increasingly reducing unstressed vowels to schwa (Kruitbosch, 2018).

• Phonological Patterns: This shift is part of a broader pattern of diphthongization in Middle English, where monophthongs in Old French became diphthongs in stressed syllables to preserve vowel contrasts.

1. Shift of [o] to [ɔ] or [oʊ]:

• Example: Old French "pomme" ([pɔmə]) to Middle English "pome" ([poʊm])

• Conditioning Factors and Environments: The vowel [o] in Old French often shifted to [ɔ] or the diphthong [oʊ] in Middle English. This shift typically occurred in stressed syllables and was conditioned by the surrounding consonantal environment, such as the presence of labial or velar consonants.

• Phonological Patterns: This fits into the broader Middle English pattern of diphthongization and the adjustment of vowel quality to maintain clear phonemic distinctions.

1. Nasalization and Vowel Lengthening:

• Example: Old French "bon" ([bɔ̃]) to Middle English "bon" ([bɔːn])

• Conditioning Factors and Environments: Nasalized vowels in Old French were often denasalized and lengthened in Middle English. This change was conditioned by the loss of nasal consonants or their weakening, leading to compensatory lengthening of the preceding vowel (Kruitbosch, 2018).

• Phonological Patterns: This shift is part of a broader pattern in Middle English of reducing nasalization while preserving vowel length to maintain syllable weight.

Broader Phonological Patterns

These vowel shifts from Old French to Middle English are not isolated phenomena but fit into broader phonological patterns (Team, 2019):

1. Vowel Lengthening in Stressed Syllables:

• Many of the vowel shifts involved lengthening, particularly in stressed syllables. This pattern helped to maintain prosodic distinctions in Middle English, emphasizing the difference between stressed and unstressed syllables.

1. Diphthongization:

• The tendency to turn monophthongs into diphthongs in stressed syllables was a way to preserve vowel contrasts in a phonological system that was increasingly reducing unstressed vowels to schwa. This pattern of diphthongization provided a clearer distinction in vowel quality.

1. Reduction of Nasalization:

• The loss or weakening of nasal consonants led to a reduction in nasalized vowels, with compensatory lengthening of the preceding vowels. This pattern reflects a broader trend in Middle English phonology towards reducing nasalization and maintaining syllable weight through vowel length.

1. Adjustment to Consonantal Environment:

• Vowel shifts were often conditioned by the surrounding consonantal environment. The presence of certain consonants, especially voiceless or velar consonants, influenced the direction and nature of the vowel shifts.

These mentioned examples highlight the dynamic nature of vowel modifications during the phonological evolution of Old French loanwords into Middle English. As these words integrated into the English lexicon, they underwent adaptations in vowel pronunciation to align with the phonetic patterns and constraints of the receiving language.

Consonant Adaptations:

In addition to vowel modifications, the transition from Old French to Middle English also entailed significant adaptations in consonant pronunciation. Consonants, like vowels, underwent changes to accommodate the phonological constraints and tendencies of the receiving language (Kruitbosch, 2018). During the transition from Old French to Middle English, the word "palais" underwent transformation into "palace." In Old French, this term was pronounced as [palɛ], where the voiced palatal fricative [ʒ ] was articulated with a more fronted and voiced quality. However, as the word integrated into Middle English, it adopted the pronunciation [pælɪs]. Interestingly, the consonant sound shifted from the voiced palatal fricative [ʒ ] to the voiceless postalveolar fricative [s], altering both its place of articulation and voicing. This shift in consonant articulation exemplifies the nuanced adaptations that occurred as Old French loanwords became ingrained in the phonological landscape of Middle English (Kruitbosch, 2018).

For instance, the Old French word "justice" (pronounced [ʒystis]) evolved into the Middle English "justice" (pronounced [dʒʌstɪs]) (Kruitbosch, 2018). Here, the Old French palatal fricative [ʒ ] was replaced by the Middle English postalveolar affricate [dʒ], reflecting a shift in consonant articulation. Similarly, the Old French word "castle" (pronounced [kastel]) transformed into the Middle English "castle" (pronounced [kɑːstəl]). In this case, the Old French voiceless velar stop [k ] remained relatively unchanged in Middle English, but the final [l ] sound underwent vocalization to [əl], reflecting a subtle but significant adaptation in consonant pronunciation.

These examples underscore the dynamic nature of consonant adaptations during the phonological transition from Old French to Middle English. As these loanwords integrated into the English phonological system, they underwent modifications in consonant articulation to fit the phonetic constraints and tendencies of the receiving language (Team, 2019).

Integration of French Fricatives

1. [ʒ] to [dʒ]:

• Example: Old French "justice" ([ʒystis]) to Middle English "justice" ([dʒʌstɪs])

• Phonological Explanation: The voiced palatal fricative [ʒ] in Old French was uncommon in Old English and Middle English. As a result, it often shifted to the more familiar postalveolar affricate [dʒ], which was already present in the English phonological inventory. This change can be attributed to the preference for affricates in English and the lack of a native [ʒ] sound.

• Conditioning Factors: This adaptation typically occurred in stressed syllables and word-initial positions, where [ʒ] was replaced with [dʒ] to align with the existing phonetic patterns in Middle English.

1. [ʃ] to [ʃ]:

• Example: Old French "chambre" ([ʃɑ̃bʁ]) to Middle English "chamber" ([ˈtʃæmbər])

• Phonological Explanation: The voiceless postalveolar fricative [ʃ] in Old French was retained in Middle English in many cases. This sound already existed in Old English, as seen in words like "ship" ([ʃip]), making it easier for the English phonological system to incorporate without significant modification.

• Conditioning Factors: The retention of [ʃ] was facilitated by its compatibility with English phonotactic constraints. It commonly appeared in both stressed and unstressed syllables, as well as word-initial, medial, and final positions.

Integration of French Affricates

1. [tʃ] from [tʃ] or [ʃ]:

• Example: Old French "château" ([ʃato]) to Middle English "castle" ([ˈkɑːstəl])

• Phonological Explanation: The Old French [ʃ] in "château" was adapted to the affricate [tʃ] in Middle English in some words, although this specific example became "castle" in English, showing an alternative adaptation. In other cases, the initial [ʃ] sound became [tʃ] to align with the English preference for affricates.

• Conditioning Factors: This change often occurred in word-initial positions and was influenced by the phonological environment, such as the surrounding vowels and consonants. The change also helped to maintain a clearer distinction between similar sounds in English.

1. [ʒ] to [z]:

• Example: Old French "rouge" ([ʁuʒ]) to Middle English "rouge" ([ruːz])

• Phonological Explanation: In some cases, the voiced palatal fricative [ʒ] shifted to the voiced alveolar fricative [z] in Middle English. This adaptation was influenced by the lack of [ʒ] in English and the presence of [z], which was more phonotactically acceptable.

• Conditioning Factors: This shift typically occurred in word-final positions where the voiced fricative was easier to pronounce and fit more naturally into the English phonological system.

Broader Phonological Patterns and Processes

1. Assimilation:

• Example: Old French "visage" ([viˈzaʒ]) to Middle English "visage" ([ˈvɪzɪdʒ])

• Phonological Explanation: The process of assimilation often influenced consonantal changes, where sounds became more similar to adjacent sounds. The adaptation of [ʒ] to [dʒ] in "visage" reflects an assimilation to the English preference for affricates, making the word more phonetically consistent with existing English words.

• Conditioning Factors: Assimilation was more likely to occur in environments where adjacent sounds influenced the articulation of the target sound, such as in clusters or near stressed syllables.

1. Deaffrication:

• Example: Old French "change" ([ʃɑ̃ʒe]) to Middle English "change" ([tʃændʒ])

• Phonological Explanation: Deaffrication is the process by which affricates become fricatives. In some instances, the adaptation of [ʃ] to [tʃ] in "change" illustrates a partial deaffrication, where the sound retains some of its fricative quality while incorporating an affricate characteristic.

• Conditioning Factors: This process often depended on the position of the affricate within the word and its phonetic environment, such as being adjacent to specific vowels or consonants that facilitated the change.

1. Voicing and Devoicing:

• Example: Old French "jour" ([ʒuʁ]) to Middle English "jour" ([dʒʊr])

• Phonological Explanation: Voicing changes occurred to adapt French fricatives and affricates to the English system. The shift from [ʒ] to [dʒ] in "jour" reflects a voicing assimilation where the voiceless quality of English fricatives influenced the adaptation process.

• Conditioning Factors: Voicing changes were influenced by the surrounding sounds and the overall phonological structure of the word, including the position of stress and the nature of adjacent consonants.

Stress Pattern Shifts:

The incorporation of Old French loanwords into Middle English also led to shifts in stress patterns, influencing the rhythmic structure and cadence of words in the English language. Stress patterns, determined by the arrangement of syllables within a word, play a crucial role in defining its phonological characteristics and overall pronunciation (Team, 2019).

For instance, the Old French word "parliament" (pronounced [parlement]) underwent a stress pattern shift in Middle English, becoming "parliament" (pronounced [pɑːrləmənt]) (Kruitbosch, 2018). In Old French, the stress typically fell on the final syllable, reflecting the language's prosodic tendencies. However, in Middle English, the stress shifted to the first syllable, resulting in a pronounced alteration in the rhythmic structure of the word. Similarly, the Old French word "royalty" (pronounced [rwalte]) experienced a stress pattern shift in Middle English, becoming "royalty" (pronounced [rɔɪəlti]) (Team, 2019). Here, the stress transitioned from the second syllable to the first, reflecting a change in the rhythmic emphasis of the word.

Furthermore, the word "charity" (pronounced [ʃaʁite]) transitioned into the Middle English "charity" (pronounced [tʃæɹɪti]). In Old French, the stress typically fell on the final syllable, reflecting the language's rhythmic structure. However, in Middle English, the stress shifted to the first syllable, resulting in a change in the rhythmic emphasis of the word (Kruitbosch, 2018). "Pardon" (pronounced [paʁdɔ̃]) evolved into the Middle English "pardon" (pronounced [pɑːrdən]). In Old French, the stress often fell on the final syllable, indicating the language's prosodic tendencies. In Middle English, the stress shifted to the first syllable, altering the word's rhythmic pattern. Another example is the word "salvation" (pronounced [salvasjɔ̃]) transformed into the Middle English "salvation" (pronounced [sælˈveɪʃən]). In Old French, the stress typically fell on the final syllable, reflecting the language's rhythmic tendencies. Again, in Middle English, the stress shifted to the first syllable, resulting in a change in the word's rhythmic emphasis  (Team, 2019). 

These examples highlight the dynamic nature of stress pattern shifts during the phonological evolution of Old French loanwords into Middle English (Kruitbosch, 2018). As these words integrated into the English language, they underwent alterations in stress placement to conform to the prosodic tendencies and rhythmic patterns of the receiving language.

6. Discussion

The findings highlight the dynamic nature of linguistic borrowing and adaptation, demonstrating that loanwords are not static entities but undergo significant changes to align with the phonological system of the borrowing language. However, beyond mere phonetic adjustments, the borrowing of words from one language to another is deeply intertwined with sociolinguistic factors, particularly the prestige and social status of the source language. In the case of Old French loanwords entering Middle English, the sociolinguistic status of French played a pivotal role in shaping the borrowing process.

French held a position of prestige and influence in medieval England, primarily due to the Norman Conquest of 1066. Following William the Conqueror's victory at the Battle of Hastings, French became the language of the ruling elite, administration, and culture. As a result, French enjoyed a higher social status compared to Anglo-Saxon, the native language of the English population. This linguistic hierarchy contributed to the widespread adoption of French vocabulary in English, particularly in domains associated with governance, law, and culture. The prestige associated with French influenced language attitudes and perceptions, leading to the incorporation of French loanwords into Middle English as markers of sophistication and refinement.

This nature is evident in the evolution of Old French loanwords into Middle English, where phonetic adjustments were necessary to ensure compatibility with the existing phonological framework. By scrutinizing these phonological changes, we gain insights into the complex processes involved in language contact and evolution. The Norman Conquest brought about a significant social hierarchy in England, with French establishing itself as the language of the aristocracy and administration. This elevated status of French facilitated its adoption into English, particularly in domains related to governance, law, and culture. The borrowing of French loanwords was not merely a linguistic phenomenon but also a reflection of power dynamics and social prestige, highlighting the interplay between language and societal structures.

7. Conclusion

This research paper reaffirms the profound impact of Old French loanwords on the English language, particularly emphasizing the pronunciation changes from Old to Middle English. Through a thorough examination of phonological transformations, this study elucidates the intricate mechanisms of linguistic adaptation and integration that occurred during this period of linguistic contact. By mapping the trajectory of these changes, we gain valuable insights into the dynamic evolution of language and the enduring interconnections between different linguistic traditions. 

The findings of this study contribute to a deeper understanding of the complex processes underlying language change and contact phenomena, highlighting the resilience and adaptability of languages in response to cultural exchange and historical influences. Overall, this research underscores the enduring legacy of Old French loanwords in shaping the phonological landscape of the English language and reaffirms the importance of studying historical linguistic interactions for a comprehensive understanding of language evolution.

Works Cited:

Alhjouj, Abdullah Hamid. “ON THE PHONOLOGICAL AND ORTHOGRAPHIC DEVELOPMENTS OF AFFRICATES IN ENGLISH.” Taiwan Journal of Linguistics. Vol. 14.2, 105-132, 2016, DOI: 10.6519/TJL.2016.14(2).4   

Baker, Peter S. Introduction to Old English (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-5272-3. 

“Borrowing in middle english.” tigerweb.towson.edu.  https://tigerweb.towson.edu/duncan/brmideng.html 

Boyd-Bowman, Peter , From Latin to Romance in Sound Charts, Georgetown University Press, ISBN 978-0878400775

Brittain, Margaret S. Historical Primer of French Phonetics and Inflection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Campbell, Alistair. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-811943-7.

Cercignani, Fausto. "The Development of /k/ and /sk/ in Old English." Journal of English and Germanic Philology. 82/3, 1983, pp. 313–323. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27709191

Gess, Randall Scott. “Optimality Theory in the Historical Phonology of French.” ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/openview/417dbc49fc9b16ba636d2eaf5ddf2d62/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y 

Harris, Martin, and Nigel Vincent. The Romance Languages, Oxford University Press, pp. 209–245, ISBN 978-0195208290.

Hogg, Richard M. The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 1: The Beginning to 1066 (Volume 1). Cambridge University Press. pp. 67–168. ISBN 978-0-521-26474-7.

Udomkesmalee, Natalie, “Historical charts of the International Phonetic Alphabet.”  internationalphoneticassociation.  www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/IPAcharts/IPA_hist/IPA_hist_2018.html. Accessed 16 Mar. 2024. 

Kibler, William W. An Introduction to Old French (Introductions to Older Languages). Modern Language Association of America, ISBN 978-0873522922.

Kruitbosch, Veerle. “The influence of Latin and French on the use and phonological development of the digraphs <ie>, <ea> and <ou> in English between 900 and 1800 CE.” https://theses.ubn.ru.nl/server/api/core/bitstreams/a0c8d406-77b3-4aba-b73d-b218b31f264e/content 

Lass, Roger. Old English: A historical linguistic companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-43087-9.

Luquiens, Frederick Bliss. An Introduction to Old French Phonology and Morphology. Legare Street Press. 2022, ISBN-13 978-1016123686

Mitchell, Bruce and Fred C. Robinson. A Guide to Old English. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-22636-2.

O’Donnell, Daniel Paul.  The Pronunciation of Old English, University of Lethbridge Personal Web Sites. people.uleth.ca/~daniel.odonnell/tutorials/the-pronunciation-of-old-english Accessed 19 Mar. 2024.

Petrák, Martin. “French loan words in English.” zcu.cz, https://dspace5.zcu.cz/bitstream/11025/22878/1/bp_petrak%20-%20final.pdf 

Price, Glanville. French Language: Present and Past. Edward Arnold, ISBN 978-0713156041.

Schrijver, Peter. Language Contact and the Origins of the Germanic Languages. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-35548-3.

ThoughtCo Team. “Terms of Enrichment: How French Has Influenced English.” ThoughtCo, 04 Nov. 2019, https://www.thoughtco.com/how-french-has-influenced-english-1371255